Systematic reviews take a long time, but are the gold standard in evaluating evidence and producing medical recommendations.

A new publication in Nature Reviews Methods Primers provides essential guidance for conducting rigorous systematic reviews on studies with animals and cells. It also highlights the benefits of these ...

The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines program employs a systematic review–based methodology to produce evidence-based guidelines. This is consistent with the stance of the ...

Clinical and Molecular Determinants of Clonal Evolution in Aplastic Anemia and Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria Singleton et al 1 performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the ...

An ad hoc committee of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will produce a report to update the standards for systematic reviews as defined in the 2011 report Finding What ...

Objective To evaluate systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) on the effects of exercise on general cognition, memory and executive function across all populations and ages. Methods ...

Background Medical specialists are integral to the medical workforce and play a pivotal role in referral systems. However, in ...

Background Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterised by impairments in social ...

Any project, supported or not by a committee, that is currently being worked on or is considered active, and will have an end date. An ad hoc committee of the National Academies of Sciences, ...