A federal judge has ruled that artificial intelligence company Anthropic did not violate copyright law when it used copyrighted books to train its Claude chatbot without author consent, but ordered ...
For a regularly updated case tracker covering intellectual property and privacy-related lawsuits concerning GenAI (including more decisions addressing fair use), see Generative AI: Federal Litigation ...
Artificial intelligence companies don’t need permission from authors to train their large language models (LLMs) on legally acquired books, US District Judge William Alsup ruled Monday. The ...
Two judges in the Northern District of California recently issued groundbreaking summary judgment rulings regarding whether an artificial intelligence company’s scraping and ingestion of copyrighted ...
Should tech companies have free access to copyrighted books and articles for training their AI models? Two judges recently nudged us toward an answer. More than 40 lawsuits have been filed against AI ...
Rackspace Technology announced the launch of its Foundry for AI by Rackspace (FAIR™) Model Context Protocol (MCP) Enterprise Accelerator on the AWS Marketplace under the new 'AI Agents & Tools' ...
The US Copyright Office's report comes as the agency is under political fire, with President Trump reportedly firing its head this weekend. Katelyn is a writer with ...
The US District Court for the Northern District of California granted summary judgment in favor of an artificial intelligence (AI) company, finding that its use of lawfully acquired copyrighted ...
Last month, the U.S. Copyright Office released a report on generative AI training, concluding that use of copyrighted materials to train artificial intelligence ...
Artificial intelligence company Anthropic is seeking to immediately appeal a judge's rejection of its fair-use defense to claims that it infringed copyright by downloading pirated books in order to ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results